(Continued from Page 2)II – The Proposed Federal Amendment Banning Very same-Sex Marriage is Contrary to the Fundamental Principles of American Democracy (continued)
C) The Objective of the Constitution is to Shield Human Rights
Each and every active amendment to the U.S. Constitution, without fail, was written to defend some particular or nonspecific group of men and women–the press, religious sects, racial minority groups, and so forth. It empowers individuals. The only amendment that didn’t empower individuals was the Eighteenth Amendment, mandating Prohibition–and we repealed that 1.
States regulate. Laws regulate. The Constitution deregulates. It untangles. It liberates. It takes energy away from the government and gives it to the individuals, not the other way about. And it must do so in order to honor the words of the Declaration marriage favors of Independence, which stated the goal of government very clearly:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are developed equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights … [and] that to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among guys, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
If we amend the Constitution to restrict rights, rather than to safeguard them, we set an ominous precedent.
III – Legalizing Identical-Sex Marriage Does Not Harm Heterosexual MarriageA) It Has Had No Apparent Damaging Effect on Heterosexual Marriage Abroad
In countries exactly where very same-sex marriage has been legalized–Belgium, Canada, the Netherlands, and Spain–the rate of heterosexual marriage stability has either gone up, remained stable, or declined consistent with other countries in the region that do not marriage favors recognize exact same-sex marriage.
A lot of critics of exact same-sex marriage cite the function of Stanley Kurtz, a pundit at the appropriate-wing Hoover Institution (which describes him in his official bio as an “outspoken combatant in America’s culture [...] Continue..